One Still Face, Many Visions
Janet E. Frick
Department of Psychology, University of Georgia
Lauren B. Adamson
Department of Psychology, Georgia State University

Tronick, Cohn, and Muir and Lee have strengthened and extended our history of the still-face procedure by reflecting on important theoretical and methodological issues in the current literature, and by looking to the future of how the still face can inform and guide further investigations. These commentaries provide a wonderful illustration of how the use of a shared, if not fully standardized, paradigm can continue to inspire ever more sharing of ideas.